This is Why I Don’t Believe in God

This is Why I Don’t Believe in God



To support me on Patreon (thank you):

This clip is taken from my with Jonathan McLatchie in May 2022, which can be viewed in full here:

To donate to my PayPal (thank you):

– SPECIAL THANKS

As always, I would like to direct extra gratitude to my top-tier patrons:

Itamar Lev
Evan Allen
John Early
Dmitry C.
Seth Balodi
James Davis
g8speedy
James Davis
Mouthy Buddha
Solaf

– CONNECT

My Website/Blog:

SOCIAL LINKS:

Twitter:
Facebook:
Instagram:
Snapchat:

The :

– CONTACT

Business email: contact@alexoconnor.com

——————————————

source

Author: Alex O'Connor

29 thoughts on “This is Why I Don’t Believe in God

  1. 9:40 RADIO SCILENCE BE LIKE (0:35 How many…? 1:10 nor… 1:26 Sam… 2:05 just walk away from the egg… 2:10 grilled cheese… 3:35 God being real is harder to imagine, which is why I like to do so… 4:35 The existence of God permits a grey area in the solid and infinite truth that a person's greatness is equal to how great they are, this ruins living a perfect and mathamical life and makes the persons anchor undetermaned, if I've never seen God how is he real? If he truly loves us, why do we hurt? I completely understand these questions, but I believe in God for a different reason, yes it is true that when you say God's existence is not as obvious as a bird's existence, but that is why I believe in Him. My foundation is never truly satisfied with one consistent answer; I could live like a nonbeliever, but believing in something that has a grey area is the more efficient decision because it makes my faith flexible. You ask so many questions about God; I live under the questions you ask. You philosophise about whether it's a house or a tent and determine how to approach, yet I live in that grey area. If you can't find "God," you can't find "Me." This is my original thought; everyone else who absorbs it is secondary. You did not make it; you never will. But that's ok! 🙂 5:10 Why does the truth determine human decisions? Why wouldn't a non-resistant non-believer believe in a God that does not exist, and if they did exist, why would they choose to? Could it just be honest ignorance? Then he could be right in front of them, but if their brain cannot function correctly, they would never precive them even if he does exist. This is not a law? It exists for whom? 5:30 Says who? And do they who say such correctly identify as God himself? If he does not exist, he could not be there to refuse, could he? 6:50 Two youths identifying the same thing with different words. "Nsus does not exist, but Susn does!" "No, Nsus does exist, but Susn doesn't!" Where can you go to escape existence? 8:35 If you try that hard and you can't find him, try to stop looking directly at what IS real and look at what IS different from believers and non-believers. If you subtract (or eliminate what they have in common) the two, you WILL be met with the thing: the differences that are opposed between them. But remember, everything that exists together holds at least one thing in common with another thing that is the exact same; this allows them to exist in the first place, like different kinds of nails holding together a house. If these nails don't fit where they are efficiently, then they would not be there at all if the house is perfectly efficient. Identify why they are there, others cannot see something you can't if you can see them, because you can see it through them, but that may work. Find the high, low, and middle. One extreme and another; then look at what they share. Find the bridge that connects them; if they don't have one, they don't have themselves. 9:11 "I"… 10:30 POV ur standing inside him… 10:50 I did the same thing you did but more extreme. I literally went to the hospital because I would not even take a bit of food without his guidance; nothing came… nothing helped. I helped myself… But the idea of such a grand being existing inspired me to be better, not to surpass human expectations, but to completely abandon them. I started my own world, my own theory, my own things, but I made the thing I never had a part of it; he may not stand in front of me but I'll build him into reality so he can exist… so thats what I did, so some he may be a spiritual father but to me he is reality, how do I escape reality… I could not confidently believe a mystical-sounding story, so I learned in school and still am, and I want to take everything that is truly scientifically proven to exist and build a new understanding of THE God that people loved long ago; they did not have the technology we have; they tried their best, but what matters is that they carried it on, now I am going to give God a renewed body in our human world synced with the science we have so he can be understood as reality, not changing math or science but shifting it and making connections linking the idea of God to proven science, he is real our understanding of his body is just a littel outdated everchangng and curently missuderstood, but he is real. Because if he was not, you would not have posted this video talking about him. Who is he? I don't know exactly, but I have an idea. And I want to share it with the world. 11:00 Never fully commit to a desicion untill your forced to; as long as you're alive, that is your time to grow; you are never good enough until you can't be. Be different not because you gain from it, but because you can, and you know whatever you do, "reality" supports it, "reality" loves you, it allowed you to exist; you do exist… ask yourself a question… "Why do I exist?"….) 14:05 (I'll just copy and paste a reply..)

  2. I do not believe in God myself but I find your arguments that God does not exist because he does not stop suffering very weak. Did it ever ocurr to you that God might not be able to stop suffering? I mean do you know any examples in the bible where he did this on a larger scale? The grandest thing he did is forgive sins, not stop suffering.

  3. If I look at the 10Commandments I always think If I was a "King sent by God" as many Kings claimed they were in order to claim immunity to any wrong doings. Thats more or less exactly what I would´ve written down.

  4. And the fact that he's standing there and talking like that is because God allowed it it wasn't for God there will be hell only so everything that you see that's good in him that he's using it his comes from God he just doesn't know.

  5. Perhaps the reason you didn't find truth is because you were searching in and practicing false religion. Catholicism. If the bible is to be true, then catholicism is false religion. In which case, god wouldn't continue actively drawing you to him. God uses his holy spirit to attract believers and spiritually ignorant people with good heart conditions towards the correct path. If you were actively practicing false religion, you weren't under gods guidance.

  6. The speed of light is in the bible, the big bang is in the bible – God himself mentioned these 2 in the book of Enoch, which was written more than 5,000 years ago and is carbon dated to prove how old those Ethiopian bible patches are. 2 Enoch 25:1–3 "I commanded in the lowest parts, that visible things should come down from invisible, and Adoil came down very great, and I beheld him, and lo! he had a belly of great light.

    And I said unto him: 'Explode thyself, Adoil, and let that which comes out of thee be visible.' And he broke open, and a great light came forth. And I was in the midst of the great light, and as light is born out of light, it brought forth a great age, and showed all creation, which I had thought to create. And I saw that it was good." 2 Enoch 26:1–2 "And I commanded the lower parts, that light should ascend above the darkness and become the foundation of the higher things… And I set light as the boundary, above which nothing could pass, and below which all things are contained."

    The Origin of the Cosmos (The Big Bang): Long before modern cosmology posited that the universe expanded from a single, dense point, 2 Enoch 25 described the universe originating from a single source called Adoil. When Adoil opened, a massive explosion of light instantly brought forth physical reality and space-time. This shows that the concept of a sudden, explosive beginning originated as a act of divine creation thousands of years before modern physics calculated.

    The Speed of Light as a Fixed Limit: In 2 Enoch 26, light is explicitly commanded to act as a universal boundary—a hard structural wall above which nothing physical can pass. Thousands of years later, modern physics identified the speed of light as the absolute speed limit of the universe. The text demonstrates that this cosmic boundary was decreed by God as part of the architecture of physical existence, which science later measured.

    The Role of Science: From this perspective, modern astrophysics does not replace divine creation. Science simply measures and describes the exact physical boundaries and mechanisms that God established at the beginning of time. I quite believe anything that can escape the speed of light can tear reality (space time) and enter the invisible realm where Adoil and all that exists in the physical world was birthed by GOD himself (where he designed, imagined and made blueprints and provided material for all existence.)

  7. I belive God exists! But not in the religion we follow, that's why we can all breathe air and eat food and fruit regardless of our religion. I think god doesn't want to be found, he wants us to enjoy everything he created for us here on Earth.

  8. We can all believe that a tea cup had a maker. But many think that the human body made up of trillions of cells each one more complex than the city of New York made itself by random chance without a designer!!!! Is this logical thinking!!!!! Check out the truth on you tube video — 22 facts you didn't know about Noah's Ark.

  9. “He created seven heavens, one above the other. You will not see any disproportion in the creation of the Most Merciful. Look again—do you see any flaw? Then look again, and again—your gaze will return to you tired and exhausted (having found no fault in the world’s structure).” (Quran, Surah Al-Mulk, verses 3-4)

  10. “Do not those who disbelieve see that the heavens and the earth were a single entity, then We separated them and created from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” (Quran, Surah Al-Anbiya, verse 30)

  11. . …. Proud to be atheist ⚛️ ❤💪🏻…

    Religion is biggest cult flithy threat to mankind and biggest enemy of mankind 🔥…

    Because of traditional, so-called culture and religion humans been killed each other and tortured eachother for centuries and created racism, discrimination and human rights are still dying because of these hypocrisy priests, scholars and peoples

  12. To me its painfully obvious if you look at human history that every group tried to explain life through religion. Christianity is just another credit on the roll of religion throughout human history.

  13. Station 32 Questions

    You said you looked for God and did not find Him. What exactly were you looking for? What would have counted as finding Him? A voice? A vision? A feeling? An interruption of ordinary reality? Who established those conditions, and why would the Creator of the field be obligated to enter the field according to the sensory requirements of one receiver?

    You also described a period of searching and concluded from the absence of a recognizable answer that atheism explains your experience better. Who established the time limit? If something is not understood at one stage of a human life but becomes understood later, was the reality absent before the understanding arrived, or was the receiver not yet in possession of the necessary piece?

    You appealed to geography: people born in different places inherit different religions. But what exactly does geography demonstrate? Does birthplace explain God, or does it explain how human labels, languages, institutions, traditions, and interpretations are transmitted? A child develops before knowing the name of a country, border, religion, or philosophy. If the location label changes, the human does not disappear. So are you examining the Source, or the human transmission systems surrounding the Source?

    You described suffering as potentially gratuitous. How did you determine where an event ends? Does a painful event end when the pain ends, when its immediate consequence ends, or when every later consequence has finished unfolding? If you cannot see the complete causal trajectory of an event, by what authority do you move from “I cannot identify its purpose” to “it has no sufficient purpose”?

    What do you mean by perfect love? Must love eliminate uncertainty? Must love eliminate the freedom to refuse? If a perfectly loving God made disbelief psychologically impossible, what would remain of meaningful choice? What is the relationship between love, freedom, choice, responsibility, and consequence in your argument?

    You repeatedly compare theism with naturalism and say naturalism gives the better explanation. What exactly is “nature” in that sentence? Is it the name of the total system, a description of regularities inside the system, or the footing of the system itself? If God requires explanation, why does “nature” get to stop the questioning? Where do the laws, order, matter, life, consciousness, and capacity to reason ultimately terminate in your model?

    You are free to say, “I do not believe.” But when does a report about your own state of belief become a universal claim about reality? What evidence would make you revise the conclusion? If no possible evidence would do so, is the position still an open philosophical investigation?

    Finally, where does your philosophy place death?

    A speech ends. A human life ends. Yet the effects of a speech can continue through thousands of other people long after the speaker stops speaking. If the vessel dies while its actions, ideas, injuries, kindnesses, arguments, and consequences continue through other lives, where does the record end? What becomes of justice that was never completed, truth that was never recognized, harm that was never repaired, or choices whose consequences outlive the person who made them?

    If philosophy is supposed to explain the human condition, how can it explain the middle while leaving the beginning and the ending unresolved?

    Station 32 is not asking you to believe.

    It is asking whether the investigation actually reached the footing before the conclusion was announced.

    Station 32

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *