Are NDEs just anecdotes, or do we now have enough information to begin collecting data on these experiences? Physicist Àlex Gómez-Marín discusses. #shorts
source
Near-Death Experiences?
Heru Interface
The Most Ethical Spiritual System for Human Consciousness
"Anecdotes are data" 🙄🙄🙄
Is winning the lottery proof that probability theory is wrong, if losing is proof that probability theory is right?
How come people keep winning? Are those just “anecdotes”?
We accept first-person accounts of all sorts of events, good and bad, without pushback. “The concert was sublime! That Monet is the best he ever painted!” We accept these pronouncements without question because they are a part of the human experience we all share. Yet when discussing the NDE, we demand empirical proof that cannot ever be given. So, we dismiss the phenomena out of hand. Why is one type of experience accepted as valid while the other is not. Why is proof demanded for the latter but not the former?
Science is just a religion of Materialism.
Nothing has ever been proven in science.
We just believe it because it's practical.
I know the best places to get exactly the data you so desperately want – mental wards. 😋
P.S. People with this childish, obviously motivated and self-reinforcing reasoning are just hilarious.
I think he is right about near death accounts & the brain
I’ve had a lot of easy-money offers. They can’t ALL be wrong, can they? 😂
hooze the nutcase in a blue suit?
Materialism is dead now.
It’s called near death experience for a reason . Ya weren’t dead when you had the experience. Probably in some subconscious state of mind , similar to dream state . There’s even suspicion of endogenous dmt at work in the matter
Brain is probably an INTERFACE between the physical n non-physical
Why is it that Hindu NDE’s never experience Jesus and Christian NDE’s never experience Brahma? Perhaps because by definition, anecdotes aren’t scientific?!
1 Anecdote = 0 data
1000 Anecdotes = 0 data
Reminds me of how Jung collected information from dreams and mandalas to form the archetypes and personality types
1000 anectodes is definitely data. The question is: data of or for what?
nothing he said about the anecdotes magically coalescing into a valid model of the human brain or its function is valid. except for the brain as filter model, which is ancient by now.
If nothing last forever, why should death be any different.
Ive been studying near death experences for years. Check out the research of the university of Virginia division of perceptual studies
Well I’ve had NDE & OBE
Atm we going thru magnetic pole shift as must do… hard to look backwards isn’t it… we’ve dealt with our stuff, is why we have it… can dredge back up…now atm this world needs an extra lot of push (oomph)
Thinking we can do this ( what we put a hand up for dont necessarily mean we can… as you can obviously see…Many accounts of what is & what isn’t… Suppose those intertwined with nature, reliant on that knowledge your best bet for a more factual earthly understanding… sorry
Robert’s face looks as though he can’t take serious a man with a ponytail.
I've had Out of Body Experiences and I know 100% I was not inside my body. You just know when it happens to you 🙂
Kenneth Ring.
PMH Atwater.