#shorts
source
Is This a Proof of Reincarnation?
Heru Interface
The Most Ethical Spiritual System for Human Consciousness
The Most Ethical Spiritual System for Human Consciousness
#shorts
source
I wish to be immortal 😀
I mean there's apperently a thing where if you ask a child (i think ehen they recently learnt to speak) they will talk to you about what people presume to be their past life or their death. Its both fasinating and terrifying. Even if its their imagination, what baffles me is how detailed they could get or how they even came up with it
That’s really sad the dad did that to those poor little girls
nice it real my fav channel give us more content like this
When I was very young 'younger 8 used to see my self in military was war now I understand was in France or Germany I never seen or now white or European people's…..another's things building's roads I never seen them before alot of kids…and… mothers…….high school yaers bad dream's peoples Deaths…death miss me 6 time.(((India disease many people's will dies …not sure yet ..if it's cov19 the water lots off people's….(((new powerful human with great powers stopping or moving anything ….even if you're thinking in your heart or mind's no …they'recoming to puts STOPS TO US BAD HUMANS….we destroying ourself and the EARTH and everything's around us only few people's they're going be in PLACE …because most of HUMANITY lost God ways ….. …………i'm Everythings is possibles with Allah(GOD) power …the Creater of everything's
Its not a mistake, ✨its a masterpiece ✨
1 up
Reincarnation is not real, its impossible to reborn in a new body. Religions are the biggest lie in this Earth. No religion is true. There's no scientific explanation for that.
I am re-Carnation
It's not a true story sounds like the parents did not get over the loss of their children and pushed the idea onto his children
If reincarnation doesn't exist? Then how babies do exist? Where are they soul coming from!
Reincarnation is the most logical thing I can imagine for continuous evolution in the universe. You don't have to remember a thing for reincarnation to be real. I hope it exists, cause 1 life will not be enough for me to do what really want in earth.
Is a "story" FROM the 50s proof?!?! Errrrrm NO!
Liar! Lair! All lies!
Wow
Yes 💯 case of reincarnation these atheists won't understand the reality
Honestly I believe it’s real everyone probably won’t be human they would more than likely be an animal that’s my opinion.
Haha , now hail Sanatan dharma and all eastern dharmic philosophies.
Abrahmic religions heaven for eternity makes no sense 😂
Without a fraction of a doubt I know on The Reincarnation of Alice to Carla Crawley
Reincarnation is so dumb, how can pepole belive it?
Soldiers are often reincarnated
Not at all.
Why u pandering Bs
if i die i really hope i don't reincarnate into this universe
I believe that reincarnation is possible but I don't think that's what we have here. The most reasonable conclusion is that the parents, particularly the father, projected the belief that his first two girls came back to him onto his youngest daughters due to an unimaginable level of grief. The kids picked up on the vibe and integrated it into their being. This could have robbed them of true individuality and caused a host of psychological traumas. This is sad. All around
I ALWAYS COME BACK
Imagine reincarnation didn’t exist while dealing with someone’s b*tchas*, jealous people, and haters.
Daddy's doing, obviously
We do restart again
I know this is my 3rd time around
I remember soo many things from my past lives , I can’t remember faces or names but places I do .
It’s all natural feelings.
The world just has gotten worse each visit .
I believe there are many of us that come back many that’s way we seem to get worse.
I don’t want reincarnation
Reincarnation is quite likely. original boble talked about it, and theres been kids with nemories of fighting in ww1 in vivid detail as an example. Also, reincarnation involves coming back as other snimals and people of different wealth and background. Nirvana is the final goal.
"reincarnated twins"
Me: that sounds familliar
I feel you use alterations with your words when explaining and describing stories that make parts a little less accurate.
If reincarnation is true, then maybe it is not bad to hope to get the soul of my late daughter back to me. It has been 10 years
I dont want to be born again because i will miss my parents
Money and no loss , amazing
People who say the idea was forced on them.. the story never said whether or not they were told about the dads theories, correct me if I'm wrong. But I've had alot of past lives myself and truly believe that, until further evidence proves otherwise, the two were reincarnated, and this is proof, memories. A strangely powerful tool for knowing previous lives.
If reincarnation does exist, I would be so happy.
This is what Dajjaal is to different people reincarnation
Do we believe what the Prophets of Allah taught us or do we believe in the Dajjaal version
I believe in reincarnation but its absolutely wild to be reincarnated into the same universe and have the same parents 😭 id want a refund bro 💀 /hj
not "proof" of anything, stop spreading these lies to kids, your making them useless
I even know my mom's past apartment before she told me even without going there cuz I was not born at that time yet when she live there back then
These girls really loaded a save file😭💀
Its scarily easy to give people false memories.
The topic of “Life after death” raises disreputable connotations of past-life regression and haunted houses, but there are a large number of people in the world who believe in some form of persistence of the individual soul after life ends. Clearly this is an important question, one of the most important ones we can possibly think of in terms of relevance to human life. If science has something to say about, we should all be interested in hearing.
Adam Frank thinks that science has nothing to say about it. He advocates being “firmly agnostic” on the question. (His coblogger Alva Noë resolutely disagrees.) I have an enormous respect for Adam; he’s a smart guy and a careful thinker. When we disagree it’s with the kind of respectful dialogue that should be a model for disagreeing with non-crazy people. But here he couldn’t be more wrong.
Adam claims that “simply is no controlled, experimental[ly] verifiable information” regarding life after death. By these standards, there is no controlled, experimentally verifiable information regarding whether the Moon is made of green cheese. Sure, we can take spectra of light reflecting from the Moon, and even send astronauts up there and bring samples back for analysis. But that’s only scratching the surface, as it were. What if the Moon is almost all green cheese, but is covered with a layer of dust a few meters thick? Can you really say that you know this isn’t true? Until you have actually examined every single cubic centimeter of the Moon’s interior, you don’t really have experimentally verifiable information, do you? So maybe agnosticism on the green-cheese issue is warranted. (Come up with all the information we actually do have about the Moon; I promise you I can fit it into the green-cheese hypothesis.)
Obviously this is completely crazy. Our conviction that green cheese makes up a negligible fraction of the Moon’s interior comes not from direct observation, but from the gross incompatibility of that idea with other things we think we know. Given what we do understand about rocks and planets and dairy products and the Solar System, it’s absurd to imagine that the Moon is made of green cheese. We know better.
We also know better for life after death, although people are much more reluctant to admit it. Admittedly, “direct” evidence one way or the other is hard to come by — all we have are a few legends and sketchy claims from unreliable witnesses with near-death experiences, plus a bucketload of wishful thinking. But surely it’s okay to take account of indirect evidence — namely, compatibility of the idea that some form of our individual soul survives death with other things we know about how the world works.
Claims that some form of consciousness persists after our bodies die and decay into their constituent atoms face one huge, insuperable obstacle: the laws of physics underlying everyday life are completely understood, and there’s no way within those laws to allow for the information stored in our brains to persist after we die. If you claim that some form of soul persists beyond death, what particles is that soul made of? What forces are holding it together? How does it interact with ordinary matter?
Everything we know about quantum field theory (QFT) says that there aren’t any sensible answers to these questions. Of course, everything we know about quantum field theory could be wrong. Also, the Moon could be made of green cheese.
Among advocates for life after death, nobody even tries to sit down and do the hard work of explaining how the basic physics of atoms and electrons would have to be altered in order for this to be true. If we tried, the fundamental absurdity of the task would quickly become evident.
Even if you don’t believe that human beings are “simply” collections of atoms evolving and interacting according to rules laid down in the Standard Model of particle physics, most people would grudgingly admit that atoms are part of who we are. If it’s really nothing but atoms and the known forces, there is clearly no way for the soul to survive death. Believing in life after death, to put it mildly, requires physics beyond the Standard Model. Most importantly, we need some way for that “new physics” to interact with the atoms that we do have.
Very roughly speaking, when most people think about an immaterial soul that persists after death, they have in mind some sort of blob of spirit energy that takes up residence near our brain, and drives around our body like a soccer mom driving an SUV. The questions are these: what form does that spirit energy take, and how does it interact with our ordinary atoms? Not only is new physics required, but dramatically new physics. Within QFT, there can’t be a new collection of “spirit particles” and “spirit forces” that interact with our regular atoms, because we would have detected them in existing experiments. Ockham’s razor is not on your side here, since you have to posit a completely new realm of reality obeying very different rules than the ones we know.
But let’s say you do that. How is the spirit energy supposed to interact with us? Here is the equation that tells us how electrons behave in the everyday world:
Dont’ worry about the details; it’s the fact that the equation exists that matters, not its particular form. It’s the Dirac equation — the two terms on the left are roughly the velocity of the electron and its inertia — coupled to electromagnetism and gravity, the two terms on the right.
As far as every experiment ever done is concerned, this equation is the correct description of how electrons behave at everyday energies. It’s not a complete description; we haven’t included the weak nuclear force, or couplings to hypothetical particles like the Higgs boson. But that’s okay, since those are only important at high energies and/or short distances, very far from the regime of relevance to the human brain.
If you believe in an immaterial soul that interacts with our bodies, you need to believe that this equation is not right, even at everyday energies. There needs to be a new term (at minimum) on the right, representing how the soul interacts with electrons. (If that term doesn’t exist, electrons will just go on their way as if there weren’t any soul at all, and then what’s the point?) So any respectable scientist who took this idea seriously would be asking — what form does that interaction take? Is it local in spacetime? Does the soul respect gauge invariance and Lorentz invariance? Does the soul have a Hamiltonian? Do the interactions preserve unitarity and conservation of information?
Nobody ever asks these questions out loud, possibly because of how silly they sound. Once you start asking them, the choice you are faced with becomes clear: either overthrow everything we think we have learned about modern physics, or distrust the stew of religious accounts/unreliable testimony/wishful thinking that makes people believe in the possibility of life after death. It’s not a difficult decision, as scientific theory-choice goes.
We don’t choose theories in a vacuum. We are allowed — indeed, required — to ask how claims about how the world works fit in with other things we know about how the world works. I’ve been talking here like a particle physicist, but there’s an analogous line of reasoning that would come from evolutionary biology. Presumably amino acids and proteins don’t have souls that persist after death. What about viruses or bacteria? Where upon the chain of evolution from our monocellular ancestors to today did organisms stop being described purely as atoms interacting through gravity and electromagnetism, and develop an immaterial immortal soul?
There’s no reason to be agnostic about ideas that are dramatically incompatible with everything we know about modern science. Once we get over any reluctance to face reality on this issue, we can get down to the much more interesting questions of how human beings and consciousness really work.
No. There’s no proof of reincarnation. There is no such thing as a past life and there’s no reincarnation.
Luke 23:43 "And he said to him, 'Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.'"
Hebrews 9:27 “It is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment.”
Yes reincarnation does exist❤️